Many people in Singapore own cars. And, one would think that if you own a car, you would be prepared to pay for a parking lot for the said car.
Unfortunately, as evidenced by some people living in my estate, that is not the case. The carpark allocation in the estate is 1 car lot per unit. Because not every resident owns a car, 5 of the carpark lots were converted to visitors’ parking, for the benefit of the residents as a whole. A handful of people (currently 3) decided to acquire second cars, and would park these second cars in the estate.
Now, the problem is this. The second cars are parked in the visitors’ lots. Which means of the 5 visitors’ lots in the estate, 3 are permanently occupied by second cars, whose owners – when they go out on weekends – tend to drive the first/primary cars out. This completely defeats the purpose of having visitors’ lots in the first place, since no visitors actually get a chance to use the lots.
When the estate’s management council decided to put in place a rule to prohibit second cars from parking in the estate at night, one particular second car owner decides to throw a fuss. He complained that as a resident, he should be entitled to have a second car lot and that the lots should not be given over to be used by visitors. He argued that visitors should not be preferred over him, a resident, in the entitlement of a lot.
But that argument completely ignores the remaining 29 units of residents who do not have second cars, and who – are more likely than not – to have friends who visit. The management council put the rule in place, so second car owners move their cars to park them outside every night. But what I don’t understand is this: if you can spend at least $80,000 on a second car, it’s quite inconceivable that you cannot spring for another $100+ a month to pay for season parking in a nearby public carpark.
H. said that it’s not a question of affordability, but just a basic selfishness and self-centred-ness.
***
We witnessed another example of this el-cheapo-ness recently. Last Sunday afternoon, when we were downstairs swimming, I noticed a red Ford Focus parked in a residents’ lot. With a 32-unit estate, it’s very obvious when a car which is not a residents’ car is parked in a residents’ lot. Presumably the owner – who was a baldie – and his daughter, entered the estate, climbed into the Ford Focus and drove off fairly quickly. Particularly as I was standing in the driveway and watching the bugger as he climbed into the car.
I didn’t give much thought to it, but took down the licence plate number of the car.
Today, when we came back from my parents’ place, I noticed a red Ford Focus come into the estate after us. We parked, walked towards the lift and all the while observed the fella parking head-first into a residents’ parking lot. We got up to the house just in time to see Baldie walking to the side gate with his daughter and presumably wife. They were headed towards Katong Mall, I think because the daughter had some enrichment classes there.
Now, on weekends, the public parking lots outside the estate are free. There are also paid lots available at Katong Mall. There were also visitors’ lots available in the estate today. But Baldie deliberately chose to park head-in into a residents’ lot instead.
He must be incredibly stupid though, since driving head-in into a parking lot does not stop people from realising that Baldie is not a resident and therefore not entitled to park in a residents’ lot. Cars have licences at the back and front, remember?
We went downstairs to check Baldie’s parking label and ascertained that: (i) he did not have an estate parking label (he did have a parking label (no. A025) for the Changi Green condo) and (ii) H. has a list of all the cars in the estate and Baldie’s SDP1560L Ford Focus was clearly not on the list.
Although we called the management agent to ask for the guard to be sent here earlier to clamp the vehicle, Baldie managed to move his car into a visitors’ lot just before 4.30pm (which is the time that the guard comes to work). Which suggests that Baldie is very familiar with how this estate is run, or alternatively, his friend saw the rude note I stuck on his windscreen and warned him about it.
Regardless, I intend to keep a watchout for Baldie and his Ford Focus the next couple of weeks. And if I manage to find out who Baldie’s friend in the estate is, I intend to give that resident a piece of my mind. Because I don’t think it’s entirely Baldie’s fault that he’s an inconsiderate basket case (it’s obviously also the fault of his upbringing and his parents), but also the friend who lets him get away with it.